TL;DR
Get gifts for the two of you delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
The source is a relationship-advice report, not a new study or a documented news event. Drawing on Gottman Institute research and other cited work, it argues that friendship and emotional connection are associated with couples’ satisfaction with sex, and recommends talking openly or seeking help when conversations stall.
The Gottman Institute has published an article about couples whose sexual intimacy has stopped or become infrequent, arguing that unspoken concerns and emotional distance can compound the problem. The piece draws on relationship research and expert advice, but it does not report a new study or establish that every couple experiencing a change in sex follows the same pattern.
The article opens with a fictionalized scene: Hannah goes to bed with a book while Luis remains in another room watching a game, and neither partner mentions their lack of sex. The vignette illustrates the report’s central subject—silence around a change in intimacy—rather than documenting an independently verified couple or event.
The article describes “dead bedroom” as an informal phrase for sexual intimacy that becomes infrequent or stops. It cites therapist Kristin Davin, writing for Choosing Therapy, who recommends expressing feelings and wants in a way a partner can hear, and seeking help when the couple cannot resolve the issue alone. The Gottman Institute says it has not studied the condition under that label.
Instead, the piece applies research associated with John and Julie Gottman on friendship, emotional connection and long-term relationships. It recounts an interview with Andy and Marcia, a couple in their sixties whose shared memories and humor suggest familiarity with each other’s inner lives. The article presents that connection as an example of what the Gottmans call a detailed “Love Map,” not as proof that friendship alone determines a couple’s sex life.
Silence Can Deepen Disconnection
The article’s practical point is that a drop in sex may become harder to address when partners avoid discussing it. One person may experience silence as rejection, while the other may be unsure how to raise the subject without creating pressure or conflict. The report presents open communication and emotional closeness as possible ways to understand what has changed, rather than treating a particular frequency of sex as a universal standard.
This framing matters because couples can face changes for many reasons, and the article does not identify one cause that applies to everyone. It points to friendship and time together as relevant to relationship satisfaction, while leaving room for partners’ circumstances and preferences. Its advice is not a guarantee that conversation will restore sexual intimacy; it is a route toward clarifying needs and deciding whether support is useful.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Research Behind the Relationship Advice
The report draws on the Gottmans’ decades of relationship research, including their work on how partners respond to each other and maintain knowledge of one another’s inner worlds. It says the Gottman Institute has not researched “dead bedroom” as a named condition. The article cites John Gottman’s written claim that 94 percent of couples who put a positive spin on their relationship history and partner’s character are likely to have a happy future. That figure is presented in the source article; its underlying study details are not provided in the material here.
The article also cites a finding from research following newlyweds into their third year: 33 percent of new parents were satisfied with their sex lives. According to the report, those couples had found time alone and discussed subjects beyond childcare. It says two randomized clinical trials later supported the idea that parents who make time for emotional connection have more sex. The source does not provide the trials’ dates, sample sizes or effect estimates, so the claim cannot be assessed in detail from the supplied material.
Another example comes from sex therapist Bernie Zilbergeld, whose study of 100 couples over 45 reportedly found that sexual techniques did not distinguish satisfied couples from unsatisfied ones; the couples still having sex had closer friendships and made sex a priority. The report uses these examples to argue for connection over technique, while noting that the couples’ experiences do not prescribe a single approach for all relationships.
“A “dead bedroom” occurs when sexual intimacy between partners becomes infrequent or stops altogether.”
— Kristin Davin, writing for Choosing Therapy
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
What the Evidence Does Not Establish
The supplied material does not give a publication date for the source article, detailed citations for every statistic, or enough information to independently evaluate the studies it summarizes. It also does not establish that a couple’s reduced sexual activity signals a relationship failure, or that emotional distance is the cause in any particular case.
The opening story about Hannah and Luis is presented as an illustrative scene, not a verified report about named people. The article does not diagnose a condition, set a threshold for how often couples should have sex, or say that its suggestions will produce a specific outcome. The reasons for a change in intimacy—and whether either partner wants to change it—remain specific to each couple.
emotional intimacy enhancement products
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Conversation and Support Are Options
The source describes no scheduled research release, policy decision or follow-up milestone. Its proposed next step for couples is to talk about what they feel and want, with care for how the other person may hear it. If the conversation repeatedly stalls or becomes difficult, the article points to outside professional support as an option.
For readers, the report’s claims should be understood as relationship guidance grounded in research the article summarizes, not as a clinical assessment. The details of any individual couple’s situation—and what kind of help may suit them—are not addressed by the source.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Key Questions
What does “dead bedroom” mean in the article?
It is described as an informal term for a relationship in which sexual intimacy has become infrequent or stopped. The article does not define a fixed number of times or a time period that applies to every couple.
Does the Gottman Institute study “dead bedrooms” as a condition?
No. The source says the Institute has not studied the issue under that name. It applies broader work on relationship friendship, emotional connection and passion to the topic.
What does the article suggest couples do?
It cites advice to express feelings and wants in a way a partner can hear. If partners cannot talk through the issue together, the article says they can seek professional help.
Does the article say emotional connection will restore sex?
No. It presents connection and communication as relevant themes in the cited research and as possible steps for couples. It does not promise that these steps will restore sexual intimacy or identify one explanation for every couple’s experience.
Source: rss
Fall Picks
fall essentials
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
